patient care perspectives

Treatment of Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment

by Paul G. Richardson, MD

Overview

Renal impairment is common in patients with multiple myeloma. It stems from a variety of causes, and treatment must be approached carefully. Our featured expert discusses the most effective treatments to preserve renal function in patients with multiple myeloma.

Expert Commentary

Paul G. Richardson, MD

Clinical Program Leader and Director of Clinical Research
Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
RJ Corman Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA

“Boronate peptide–based proteasome inhibitors have a favorable effect on the kidney, as do steroids. In fact, bortezomib-based therapy combined with steroids, cyclophosphamide, and adequate hydration is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple myeloma in the context of significant renal impairment.”

Paul G. Richardson, MD

The persistent circulation of abnormal light chains and heavy chains is integral to multiple myeloma–related renal pathology, with myeloma cast nephropathy currently being the most common renal complication and immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis becoming increasingly common as our patients live longer. Consequently, being attentive to preserving renal function is essential when making treatment decisions and in optimizing outcome.

Maintaining hydration is critical for protecting renal function in patients with multiple myeloma because these individuals are highly prone to dehydration and are vulnerable to vascular hypoperfusion—an effect that may contribute to a variety of complications, including neurotoxicity and other end-organ injury. Boronate peptide–based proteasome inhibitors have a favorable effect on the kidney, as do steroids. In fact, bortezomib-based therapy combined with steroids, cyclophosphamide, and adequate hydration is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple myeloma in the context of significant renal impairment. Oral ixazomib can cause gastrointestinal effects such as diarrhea, so care to avoid exacerbating renal impairment through dehydration is important. Carfilzomib must be used with caution in patients with significant renal impairment, as it can exacerbate renal dysfunction. Advising patients to be alert to other risks to their kidneys is also important. For example, a patient with multiple myeloma might be inclined to reach for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for bone pain, but they can be hazardous in the setting of light chain production. In addition, vitamin C intake in excess of 500 mg per day can precipitate light chain deposition by acidifying the urine. Intravenous contrast for computed tomography imaging should be used with great caution, and this risk may be underappreciated in the emergency department and by less experienced radiologists. Hypercalcemia is less of an issue today than in the past, owing to the efficacy of bisphosphonates and to biologic antiresorptive agents such as denosumab. Denosumab has been revolutionary because it enables us to use bone-targeting therapy in patients with renal dysfunction without penalty; however, a significant issue that may arise is the potential for hypocalcemia. We have encountered admissions for profound hypocalcemia and even tetany in patients whose outside physicians had not been vigilant about tracking their calcium levels while on therapy.

References

Dimopoulos MA, Roussou M, Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Cardiac and renal complications of carfilzomib in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2017;1(7):449-454.

Gonsalves WI, Leung N, Rajkumar SV, et al. Improvement in renal function and its impact on survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e296.

Heher EC, Goes NB, Spitzer TR, et al. Kidney disease associated with plasma cell dyscrasias. Blood. 2010;116(9):1397-1404.

Oortgiesen BE, Azad R, Hemmelder MH, et al. The impact of the introduction of bortezomib on dialysis independence in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: a nationwide Dutch population-based study. Haematologica. 2018;103(7):e311-e314.

Raje N, Terpos E, Willenbacher W, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(3):370-381.

More in Multiple Myeloma

Thumb

Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Recommendations for the Treatment of Elderly or Frail Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Patient Care Perspectives by Carol Ann Huff, MD

Optimizing the care of older patients with multiple myeloma involves striking a balance between efficacy and toxicity. It also involves a deep unde...READ MORE

Thumb

Multiple Myeloma

Treatment Protocols for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Relapse After Transplant

Clinical Topic Updates by James R. Berenson, MD

While most patients with multiple myeloma will achieve disease control with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), virtually all of these individu...READ MORE

Thumb

Multiple Myeloma

Quality of Life and Supportive Care for Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Patient Care Perspectives by James R. Berenson, MD

Owing to significant bone pain, vulnerability to infection, fatigue, and other symptomatology related—and unrelated—to multiple myeloma, the diseas...READ MORE

More In Oncology

CLL

High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Insights and Approaches

Expert Roundtables by Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD; John C. Byrd, MD; and Susan O’Brien, MD

HR-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Second-line Treatment for Advanced/Metastatic HR+ HER2- Breast Cancer

Clinical Topic Updates by Joseph A. Sparano, MD, FACP

HR-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

First-line Therapy for Advanced HR+ HER2- Breast Cancer

Patient Care Perspectives by Joseph A. Sparano, MD, FACP