clinical topic updates

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

by Eric C. Klawiter, MD, MSc

Overview

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators are an important addition to the list of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). In addition to their oral route of administration, they provide significant clinical benefits at acceptable levels of risk, and they compare favorably with injectable platform and other oral therapies.

Expert Commentary

Eric C. Klawiter, MD, MSc

Associate Neurologist
Massachusetts General Hospital
Associate Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA

“One advantage of this particular class of agents is that we have head-to-head comparisons in clinical trials demonstrating superior efficacy vs other DMTs.”

Eric C. Klawiter, MD, MSc

Fingolimod is an S1PR modulator and the first oral medication to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of MS. Initially, fingolimod was used primarily as a second-line treatment for relapsing-remitting MS. As we became more comfortable with the side-effect profile of fingolimod, however, it began moving into the first-line treatment category for relapsing MS.

During the last several years, this particular space has become a bit more crowded with the introduction of several treatments that have a more selective effect on certain S1PRs. These newer approved S1PR modulators provide additional treatment options to our patients and include siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod. In general, this class of medications includes some of our best-tolerated MS treatments. With the more selective S1PR modulators, the cardiac effects have been somewhat diminished. And, for some patients, the 6-hour first-dose monitoring is no longer required, which is a major logistical benefit.

One advantage of this particular class of agents is that we have head-to-head comparisons in clinical trials demonstrating superior efficacy vs other DMTs. Compared with interferons, agents in the S1PR modulator class have demonstrated improvements in reducing the risk of relapse, sustained disability progression, the likelihood of new magnetic resonance imaging changes, the development of new T2 and Gd+ lesions, and the rate of whole brain and/or cortical and deep gray matter brain atrophy.

Current data suggest that siponimod and ozanimod have greater selectivity for S1PRs 1 and 5, whereas ponesimod has greater selectivity for S1PR 1. The extent to which these properties relate to differences in clinical efficacy are not yet known. The most robust data we have with these agents are in patients with relapsing forms of MS. Siponimod also carries an indication for active secondary progressive MS, where very few treatment options exist.

References

Cohan S, Lucassen E, Smoot K, Brink J, Chen C. Sphingosine-1-phosphate: its pharmacological regulation and the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review article. Biomedicines. 2020;8(7):227. doi:10.3390/biomedicines8070227

Comi G, Kappos L, Selmaj KW, et al; SUNBEAM Study Investigators. Safety and efficacy of ozanimod versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (SUNBEAM): a multicentre, randomised, minimum 12-month, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(11):1009-1020. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30239-X

Groves A, Kihara Y, Chun J. Fingolimod: direct CNS effects of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulation and implications in multiple sclerosis therapy. J Neurol Sci. 2013;328(1-2):9-18. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.011

Kappos L, Bar-Or A, Cree BAC, et al; EXPAND Clinical Investigators. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study [published correction appears in Lancet. 2018;392(10160):2170]. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1263-1273. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30475-6

Slowik A, Schmidt T, Beyer C, Amor S, Clarner T, Kipp M. The sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor agonist FTY720 is neuroprotective after cuprizone-induced CNS demyelination. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172(1):80-92. doi:10.1111/bph.12938 

More in Multiple Sclerosis

Thumb

Multiple Sclerosis

Questions Surrounding Early Use of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Study Insights by David A. Hafler, MD

What we have learned from rheumatoid arthritis, where we can see the initial event, is that if you go in hard with the biological anti–tumor necros...READ MORE

Thumb

Multiple Sclerosis

Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Patient Care Perspectives by Dean Wingerchuk, MD, FRCP(C)

For over 10 years, the most common treatment practice for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) has been what is referred to as an escalation appro...READ MORE

Thumb

Multiple Sclerosis

Comorbidities in Multiple Sclerosis and Impact on Diagnosis and Management

Clinical Topic Updates by Patricia K. Coyle, MD, FAAN, FANA

Emerging data link a range of comorbidities in multiple sclerosis (MS) to diagnostic delays, disability progression, health-related quality of life...READ MORE

More In Neurology

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Importance of Seizure Control in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Expert Roundtables by David N. Franz, MD; Gary W. Mathern, MD; and Elizabeth A. Thiele, MD, PhD

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Current Concepts for Multidisciplinary Care in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Expert Roundtables by David N. Franz, MD; Gary W. Mathern, MD; and Elizabeth A. Thiele, MD, PhD

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex–Associated Epilepsy

Expert Roundtables by David N. Franz, MD; Gary W. Mathern, MD; and Elizabeth A. Thiele, MD, PhD